Wednesday, October 12, 2022

The NIV Is The Antichrist's Bible!

 
Photo above: I scanned the back cover of Dr. Al Lacy's excellent book titled, “NIV: THE ANTICHRIST'S BIBLE,” so you can read what the book is about. If you click the photo, you'll get a bigger photo.

The following article is being written from information that I learned from Dr. Al Lucy's awesome book titled, “NIV: THE ANTICHRIST'S BIBLE.” HARD COPIES are available here. The book contains 58 pages and was transcribed from a sermon which Pastor Lacy preached around the country. The information is excellent and needs to be shared with everyone that you know. According to Wikipedia, the NIV (New International Version) is the most popular version being used in churches today, and that sadly includes our Independent Fundamental Baptist Churches.

Kindly, Bob Jones University, Moody Bible Institute, and now tragically, Hyles-Anderson College, no longer criticize the modern false versions of the Bible. It's not enough these days to sit on the sidelines and let others fight the good fight of faith. There is overwhelming evidence of satanic corruption of the modern Bible versions by the occult.

The Bible foretold of these apostate times when people would no longer tolerate sound Bible preaching!!! 2nd Timothy 4:3-4, “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.” The Greek word for “fables” is muthos and means, “a tale, fiction.” People today are being deflected from the truth, instead being led by Satan into tasty half-baked lies, attractive fiction and appealing manmade tradition.

Dr. Martin R. DeHaan (1891-1965) warned:
"Be on guard against any tampering with the Word, whether disguised as a search for truth, or a scholarly attempt at apparently hidden meanings; and beware of the confusion created by the senseless rash of new versions, translations, editions, and improvements upon the tried and tested Bible of our fathers and grandfathers."

SOURCE: Dr. M.R. DeHaan, from the excellent book, THE TABERNACLE, Pg. 101
The New International Version [NIV] of the Bible deceitfully changes the phrase “Son of God” in John 9:35 to “Son of Man.” Professor Gail Riplinger revealed from research that the NIV has either changed or removed 64,000 words as compared to the King James Bible. I highly recommend the books of Dr. Riplinger, available online. Here's some YouTube videos of her book, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS—INTRO | CHAP 3 | CHAP 7 (by Dr. Gail Riplinger; online audiobook). Also, please see, NEW AGE BIBLE VERSIONS (1:23 hour MP3 interview with Dr. Gail Riplinger; you've got to hear this!).
Occult Roots Of The Modern Bible Versions (tons of occult information on Westcott and Hort)

Theosophy, The Church and Lucifer Worship (Helena Blavatsky said they'd infiltrate the churches)
The following is an excellent eye-opening quote from STRAIGHTWAY magazine (2005 June/July issue) which is as applicable as ever in 2015. I agree that the increasing phenomena of hundreds of English Bible versions (now at 500) being published is almost assuredly a guarantee, that it will all culminate with one Luciferian counterfeit Bible version which will have successfully infiltrated and corrupted the churches to join the demonic emerging church movement as foretold by occultist Alice Bailey. ...
Why So Many English Bible Versions Today?
STRAIGHTWAY | June/July 2005
By Dr. H. T. Spence

In recent weeks the American Bible Society has stated that the growing number of English Bible versions on the market today has reached over five hundred. When both Higher and Lower Biblical Criticism arose over 150 years ago in the Liberal and Modernist camps, no one would have imagined the rise of hundreds of English translations vying for the popular market. Who would have thought that the discovery of a manuscript in a wastebasket of a monastery at the foot of Mt. Sinai would have caused the Protestant world to clamor over a text that has become the womb of the new English-translation movement throughout the English-speaking world? Not even the contemporary translators have been able to agree upon that one text—the overwhelming vast majority of the English versions today have sprung from that one manuscript. When one of these versions has made its way into the market, another one rises to declare its uniqueness and peculiarities.

Yet in spite of all these versions, there is more confusion about the Bible, more questioning of it, and more doubting of it today than in any other time in history. This delusion within the ranks of the institutional church is ever deepening. Most ministers of our contemporary spend much of their sermon time criticizing the Scripture they read and questioning whether it should even be in the Bible. They believe they have been called to be Bible Critics rather than Bible Proclaimers. Is it not proper to stop and consider the spirit behind the fevered debate over the multi-English Bible versions?

The Coming Final Bible Version
God often uses "forerunners" before the final appointments in His plan. He used John the Baptist to "prepare the way" of the Lord, making the path straight for His coming. He used "pre-reformers" before the Reformation's reformers. The same is true in finally bringing forth the Word of God to the English-speaking world: God chose the beginnings with the Wycliffe, Tyndale, Geneva versions, and others to be forerunners to prepare for the coming of a translation that would be a consummated English translation drawing from the previous ones. The King James Version became the one upon which God placed His providential hand preserving it over these past several centuries in the English-speaking world.

We are now witnessing in the end time the global falling away of the institutional Christian Church. The accepted trend of the versions is now rapidly mutating with every new version providing its own unique contribution. As there was a moving of God to prepare and pave the way for the coming appointed English version, is there a "coming version" that will be the final "Bible" for the final Apostate Church?

Is the multi-version debate preparing the world for a coming final version? No doubt, this final version will have all the ingredients needed to be accepted by the world church. Is the present plethora of English versions merely a collection of forerunners needed to acclimate "the church" for diversity of thought and interpretation?

What will the final "version" be called? Though the New International Version in recent years has outsold the KJV as the new "accepted" version, what will be on the horizon next year and the next, and the next? What surprising find will draw the church scholars into a carnal frenzy and cry, "We have found the true Bible"? The Church of earth is accepting the trend of change even in their view of God and His Word, ever changing with every generation. As the NIV is accepted today by a strong portion of the New Age Movement, what version out there will be accepted by all lifestyles, all beliefs, all religions, and all ethnic groups? The Antichrist will not come at the beginning necessarily denying the Word of God but simply questioning as the serpent, "Yea, hath God said?" (Genesis 3:1). This is the great controversy of the "versions" debate today—it is a serpentine debate.

Our modern English world is now in the mood for new versions; they are strongly discontent with the old. It is part of the Neo movement for the final apostate church that will lead the rest of the religious world to ride the back of the scarlet colored beast (Rev. 17:3). What will be the "version" to which all of the English versions today are leading? ...

Preserving The Preserved Word
According to Deuteronomy 17:18 and 31:26, the scroll of Moses' writing was placed in the "side" [sleeve, or holster] of the Ark of the Covenant. Future kings of Israel were to make a copy from that original. This principle has been one of the unique characteristics of the King James Version: it was copied or prepared for a king. The later versions have no such biblical identification.

We do not give allegiance to the "advanced revelation" view or that the beloved King James Version is as inspired as the original manuscripts. But we do believe that God has preserved this version for the English-speaking world. It is not so much the unending debate of scholarship to which we look, but to the sovereign workings of God throughout its history. It is too late in the End Time to get another version; there is no time to try and test it as the KJV has been. The present popular versions will eventually wane in their "rise to fame" while another version will have for a season its day in the sun of depraved humanity. While these others rise with boastings, popularity, global acceptance, and glamorous endorsements, the beloved KJV (that God has honored) has been in these final days of the End Time maligned, hated, intimidated, belittled (as God's saints will be by the popular church), and retired to never publicly battle the apostasy again.

No other version has ever been identified with the battle against the apostasy and Romanism as the beloved KJV. All of the versions of modern times have been part of the Neo-Christianity movement; this must be acknowledged. Even the most "conservative" version elevated today in Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism has not and is not identified with the battle against Rome, the End-time Mother Harlot, and the global apostasy of Protestantism. However, the KJV has been hated by the Church of Rome over these centuries as well as by the World Council of Churches. How often you can tell the character of a thing by its enemies . . . and by its friends.

My dear earthly father (shortly before his death in the year 2000) gave seven precious principles for teaching others to preserve the preserved Word of God:
  1. Preserve it in Love. This means to simply preserve it, not prove it.
  2. Preserve it by always using it publicly. This means to publicly preserve, not publicly compare it.
  3. Preserve it by defending its English words publicly. This means to use its English words paramount to the English audience, not defending it by Biblical languages as a greater authority for the audience.
  4. Preserve it in English Bible departments in Christian schools. This means teach the Elizabethan English distinctives of that time of the unity of the KJV in reaction to the contemporary time in which we live.
  5. Preserve it by witnessing and evangelizing—planting KJV words for evangelism and revival. This means we teach that God has His Word in our English-speaking world.
  6. Preserve it in power. This means that an English word, under the work of the Holy Spirit, has the power of the Word of God behind it.
  7. Preserve it in the doctrine to others, too. This means that all the fundamental principles of the Gospel can be easily found in the KJV.
Let us preserve the Preserved Word of God by practicing these principles.

Conclusion
Our need is not "better renderings" but rather a "better understanding" of that which has already been rendered through the years. As the English-version controversy rages all around us concerning the KJV, may we not hurt the good and reliable while purporting that we have found the better. May God have mercy on Fundamentalism as it has certainly entered into the vestibule of the "contemporary" with its generic preaching, Neo-Evangelical music, and scholastic intoxication with the multi-version debate. [emphasis added]

Satan's NIV Turns Salvation Into a Process Instead of a Birth

Let's examine the question: Do people come to Christ for salvation through the NIV? Here's a comparison between 1st Corinthians 1:18 in the King James Bible and the NIV...
KING JAMES BIBLE — 1st Corinthians 1:18, “For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.”

NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION — 1st Corinthians 1:18, “For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.”

NEW INTERNATIONAL READER'S VERSION — 1st Corinthians 1:18, “The message of the cross seems foolish to those who are lost and dying. But it is God’s power to us who are being saved.”
Do you see how the NIV perverts salvation into a process? The NIV says that believers are “being saved,” but the King James Bible says we “are saved.” The NIV supports the Calvinistic heresy of the Perseverance of the Saints. The Salvation Army teaches this heresy, and I quote:
“We believe that continuance in a state of salvation depends upon continued obedient faith in Christ.” 
Isn't that horribly sad? The Salvation Army believes that faith and good works are required to stay saved. My friend, salvation is a miraculous new-birth; not a lifestyle to be lived, nor a philosophy to ascribe to, nor a business, nor a culture, nor is it joining a religious organization. If I have to do anything to remain in a state of salvation, then salvation is by partial faith in Christ plus human effort. The Word of God teaches clearly that salvation is 100% by completely resting in the sacrifice of Christ on the cross, Who died and rose up for our justification.

Also, notice that the NIV in 1st Corinthians 1:18 changes the word “preaching” to the word “message.” This evil milquetoast generation hates Bible-preaching. The great need of the hour is preaching preachers. My friends, our nation's greatest need is PREACHING PREACHERS!!! We are at war with the Devil. Somebody needs to get mad at the Devil and say it like it is, and it needs to be said. Somebody needs to warn that Satan is corrupting our Bibles, as I have just showed you. The NIV changes 64,000 words as compared to the trustworthy King James Bible. The NIV is truly the Antichrist's Bible!

NIV Removes “the Son of God”

Here is the precious, inspired and accurate King James Bible:
John 9:35, "Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God?"
Now here is the butchered and corrupt NIV:
John 9:35, "Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when he found him, he said, 'Do you believe in the Son of Man?' ”
What a horrible perversion to the Scriptures? Jesus had just made a blind man to see by spitting into the dirt and putting clay upon the man's eyes. The man had been born blind. Jesus miraculously healed the man so that God would be glorified. Afterwards Jesus found the man, who had been kicked out of the synagogue by the Jewish religious leaders. Jesus asked the man if he believed on the Son of God? The man said “yes” and worshipped Jesus!!!

According to John 20:31, the Gospel of John was written to convince humanity that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, so that by believing on Jesus anyone can be saved:
John 20:31, "But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name."
Why, oh why, would anyone tamper with the all-important message of the Gospel of John? Jesus asked the man if he believed on the Son of God? Most people believe that a man named Jesus existed in the flesh; but very few people believe that God came in the flesh (1st Timothy 3:16).

Jesus didn't ask the man if he believed Jesus was the Son of Man. No, rather, Jesus asked the man if he believed on THE SON OF GOD?

Do you believe on the precious Son of God. I do!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Dr. John R. Rice Didn't Think Present-Day Israel Is The Fulfillment Of Bible Prophecy, And Neither Do I

Revelation 11:8, “And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also o...