John 1:12, “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.” 1st John 3:1, “Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.”
The NIV, ESV and ERV (and several dozen more) Bible revisions all teach heresy, because Jesus is not God's one and only Son. By removing the all-important word “begotten” they have perverted the words of the living God. Those unscholarly intellectuals never read our text Scriptures. Evidently the ignoramuses who translated the NIV never read John 1:12 and 1st John 3:1. The truth of the matter is that God has MANY sons, but only one “BEGOTTEN” (or biological) Son, according to John 3:16. If you are a born-again child of God, male or female, then you are an adopted son of God. Isn't that beautiful? If you are saved, you my friend are an adopted child of God. Jesus is the only 'BEGOTTEN' biological child of the Father. We have been begotten by the incorruptible seed of God's Word (1st Peter 1:23), through the power of the Holy Spirit (John 1:12-13), through faith in the Gospel (1st Corinthians 15:1-4).
By the way, I am sick and tired of Smart Alecs mentioning the Bible in other languages to criticize the King James Bible. I speak English and this is America, so shut up already! I cannot speak for people in other countries. If someone accurately translates the Textus Receptus (the manuscript from which our beloved King James Bible was translated) into another language, then it is inspired. What does that have to do with the King James Bible being inspired? I heard some fool attempting to discredit the exclusivity of the King James Bible by pointing out that the Geneva Bible is also a good Bible. The Geneva Bible is inferior, a predecessor to the King James, so why would you use it? I mean, why change what has worked for 419 years so far since 1611? I'll stick with the time-proven and tested King James Bible. Kindly, if neo-evangelicals like Harvest Baptist Church on Guam, and Bob Jones University, want to dabble in doctrines in demons, fake Bibles, and another gospel of partial faith in Christ plus works (aka, Lordship Salvation), then knock your socks off!
How could the NIV translating committee be so incompetent? It is no small matter to translate the Word of almighty God, especially when you CHANGE what He said. The Bible, in numerous references, warns and pronounces a curse upon all Bible corrupters (Deuteronomy 4:2; Galatians 1:8-9; 2nd Peter 3:16; Revelation 22:19). “...for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God” (Jeremiah 23:36). Now they're catering to the sinful agendas of lesbians and feminists with their NIV 2011, which is a gender-inclusive Bible. Please remember that lesbianism, transgender, gender equality and unisex are synonymous with the sinful philosophy and lifestyle of feminism, which is rebellion against God-ordained masculine authority.
The King James Bible translates John 3:16 absolutely 100% correct. The word “begotten” is there in John 3:16, because Jesus is indeed the only begotten Son of God. Every born again believer is an adopted son of God... “To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons” (Galatians 4:5). Every Christian is an adopted child into God's family. So if you have a Bible, make sure that the word “begotten” in present in John 3:16, or else throw it into the garbage after tearing it up. Why Would Anyone Use the NIV? And by the way, the same corruption is made in 1st John 3:16. Every born-again believer is an adopted son of God, but only Jesus is God's begotten Son.
No comments:
Post a Comment