America's Corrupt Court System

Genesis 9:6, “Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”

The present ongoing Lindsay Clancy court trial is a disgraceful sham, a travesty of justice. The jury is gridlocked because one juror refuses to agree with the other eleven jurors, clearly in favor of letting her go. The judge even said he is ready to acquit Clancy. But ladies and gentlemen, that is the whole purpose of having a jury, so that each individual juror has a legal right to vote according to their own conviction, not some kangaroo court that is bending their arm to vote a certain way. It couldn't be more obvious that the court system has already decided how this ruling should . 

On January 24, 2023, Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children—five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan—at the family's home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, United States. She then attempted suicide by cutting her wrists and neck and jumping from a second-story window, sustaining injuries that left her paralyzed from the waist down. Lindsay later said she heard an auditory hallucination ordering her to commit the acts and felt an irresistible urge to comply.

Lindsay was charged with three counts of murder. Although she did not dispute killing her children, her defense argued that she had been suffering from postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder and should not be held criminally responsible. After the birth of her third child, Lindsay had spent months seeking help from multiple healthcare providers for symptoms including insomnia, intrusive thoughts, and suicidal ideation. Prosecutors maintained that she was in control at the time of the killings and that her actions beforehand, including sending her husband on an errand, showed methodical planning. They emphasized that she reported hearing the voice only once, on the day of the killings, and that none of her providers had previously documented signs of psychosis. Wikipedia

Feminism has done incalculable damage to western civilization. There is no more fundamental yet delicate Biblical relationship in society than male and female. Genesis 1:27, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” On this divine reality depends the family, the oxygen of society. Nobody with the best interests of a healthy society at heart would dare to divide men and women, as do wicked atheist liberals like Miss Gloria Steinem (who died on Wednesday, September 2, 2026).

The lie that men have exploited women has become official orthodoxy in western society. The present despicable Lindsay Clancy court trial is proof enough of that. If the accused were a male, for brutally strangling his three children to death in a basement while hearing an alleged mysterious voice from within telling him to do it, there would be zero sympathy from anyone.

It was reported today on NBC Nightly news that the judge is upset with one of the twelve jurors for not following the guidelines for Reasonable Doubt. That simply means that the judge has already made a decision to let Miss Clancy go free from prison, but one juror thinks she is guilty. Miss Clancy definitely should be found guilty according to the Holy Bible. Genesis 9:6, “Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”

Human Life Is Sacred

Human life is so sacred to our Creator, that He said this:

Exodus 21:22-25, “If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”

Yet, our ungodly American court system has chosen instead to grant free passes to certain individuals, particularly crazy women who commit mass-murder. I find no such extenuating circumstances in the inspired Word of God for insane criminals. As you just read in Exodus 21:22-25, if two men are fighting and accidently strike a pregnant woman so that her child is stillborn, those men must also die. This is the reciprocating law of life—and eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. That is justice—a balancing of the scales (Matthew 7:2).

One could have easily argued that Charles Manson’s followers’ Susan Atkins, Patricia Krenwinkel, Leslie Van Houten, Lynette Fromme and Sandra Good were all under the control of Charlie Manson (1934-2017). The Manson killings, specifically the Tate-LaBianca murders, occurred in 1969. Charles Manson and his followers committed these brutal murders in Los Angeles during the nights of August 8 and 9 (although Charlie himself never actually killed anyone). It couldn’t have been more obvious, even still today from all the evidence, that those teenage girls were under Manson’s evil control, not in their right minds. But the court system didn’t cut them any slack and the judge locked them away for life.

Lindsay Clancy Will Be Acquited

If there is justice in the final outcome of Lindsay Clancy’s court hearing, Biblically, she will be sentenced to death. We cannot have a biased court system that generates compassion for alleged crazy people, while crucifying others with no mercy. It upsets me when judges and courts play favorites and pressure the jurors to vote a certain way. That is not justice! That is a kangaroo court.

The judge William Sullivan in this case is incompetent in my humble opinion. He is pressuring the one remaining juror to vote a certain outcome, and that is a rigged jury. The whole idea of “Reasonable Doubt” doesn't even apply to this case at all. Miss Clancy brutally murdered all three of her children. She planned the murders! 

Court records detail Lindsay Clancy's disturbing account of the hours before her three children were murdered. Prosecutors argue that she carefully planned the murders—the killings were deliberate. Prosecutors have pointed to Miss Clancy asking her husband to leave the house to go pick up takeout food, so she could murder their children.

Dear reader, there is no Reasonable Doubt that Lindsay Clancy is guilty! But she won't be going to prison, I assure you. The corrupt judge has already decided that Clancy will go free, and now he is disgustingly MANIPULATING the jurors to obey his command, or else he will fire the juror, or just acquit Miss Clancy (to the cheers of hundreds of angry feminists outside the courthouse). Judge Sullivan said today that he is ready to acquit Lindsay Clancy! That is not justice!

Why even have a jury if you're going to manipulate and pressure the jurors to vote a certain outcome? The judge ridiculously said today he didn't want to give the appearance that he has his foot on the scale. Are you kidding me? Ha Ha Ha! Of course Judge Sullivan has his foot on the scales of justice; it couldn't be more obvious. This whole court case is a big hoax—a travesty of justice—which we have seen again and again and again in the United States. If jurors are manipulated to vote a certain way, then there is no honest process of justice.

We see this evil garbage on a regular basis where judges dismiss evidence that could potentially help to exonerate the accused. The reason why judges do this evil thing is because they have already pre-decided the outcome of the trial, and now must manipulate the flow of evidence and the jurors to get that pre-decided outcome. That is a kangaroo court, not fairness, not justice.

Furthermore, just because 11 jurors vote not guilty, but one juror votes guilty, doesn't mean that there's something wrong with that one juror. What kind of court system do we have in America when it is controlled by mob rule of law? The court room is not a democracy! Every juror has a right to vote their conscience. The very fact that one or two jurors would be scolded, manipulated and pressured to vote a certain way is WRONG!

Why Bother To Have Juries Anymore?

I got upset while watching the news tonight, when I saw Judge William Sullivan getting angry at the one juror who wouldn't vote the way he wants them to vote. Why even have a jury if you're going to pressure, coerce and manipulate jurors to vote the way you want them to?

The basic idea behind Reasonable Doubt is what would any reasonable person who is healthy and mentally sane think? But whether or not an accused person is guilty goes much deeper than that. It also delves into a juror's religious beliefs, convictions and moral integrity. An atheist woman who has had two abortions is far more likely to vote not guilty, than a Christian mother who has never had an abortion. Those two women have obvious drastic different moral values and opinions about human life. So, the whole concept of Reasonable Doubt is flawed as a means of determining court outcomes. Since there are 9 women and 3 men on the jury, I am curious if the one juror holding out is a male or female. It matters and you know why.

The concept that crazy people are exempt from being held accountable for their crimes is wrong. The strong argument could be made that no one is in their right mind when they commit heinous crimes. Feminism unfairly empowers westernized women through the courts to do whatever they want without suffering any consequences for their words or actions. 

Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female instincts, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere “social constructs” and “stereotypes.” This is a malicious attack on all heterosexuals, which comprise 99% of the population. Talk about hatred! Yet, such warped ideologies are sinfully taught to children in elementary throughout high school. It is echoed in the controlled media. Wicked lesbians like Rosie O’Donnell, Angelina Jolie, Megan Rapinoe, Billie Jean King, and Ellen DeGeneres are shamefully advanced as role models in society to young girls. How much longer will God's justice sleep on our perverse society in the United States?

I don't need to watch the news in the days to come to see what the outcome of the Lindsay Clancy court trial will be, because it is obvious that the judge has already decided the outcome, to acquit her. Maybe we should just stop using juries, since our judges don't let the jurors make their own decisions anymore. What a kangaroo court!