Why We Have Fundamentalist Christianity

Revelation 3:1-2, “And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead. Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God.”

In our personal lives as humans, we all choose where to draw the lines concerning issues of morality, tolerances and convictions. If we were to gather three hundred professed Christians into one room, there would be umpteen different opinions and points of conflict. And it is for this very reason that fundamental Bible Christianity exists today.

Case in point is the fundamentalist Baptist preacher who harps against women wearing pants in public. According to the Bible, women ought not wear men's clothing (Deuteronomy 22:5). Only a fool would dare dismiss such a moral command God God, throwing modesty under the bus as mere ceremonial law, which doesn't apply today. In it's most basic form, Christian fundamentalism is simply a child of God choosing to stay farther to the right than the left.

In the case of women wearing pants, a conservative godly woman who fears God wouldn't dare even think of putting on a pair of blue jeans. I have heard every excuse imaginable from wicked neo-evangelical churchgoers who attempt to justify women wearing pants. They are a nasty religious bunch, worldly, indifferent and following Jesus afar off.

The reason why we have fundamental Bible Christianity still today is because there is a remnant of God's children who fear God and desire to please Him. Since everyone sets the bar of morality at different levels, we need to separate from those who choose to live by lower moral standards, lest they corrupt our good morals.

Concerning open fornication being tolerated in the Church at Corinth, the Apostle Paul wrote:

1st Corinthians 5:6-9, “Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.”

By tolerating open sexual sin in the congregation, the Apostle warned the church elders that a little rot in time could corrupt the entire church! That is what “leaven” is, yeast mold, bacteria. And this is the heart of Bible fundamentalism folks—setting moral and doctrinal standards high in a local church. Everyone has their own opinion about the different Bible revisions, about how you get to Heaven, about Zionism, the age of the earth, the timing of the Rapture, what attire is modest or worldly, and thousands of other issues.

As a general rule, people reach low when it comes to holiness and truth. It's is not easy for a young Christian woman to wear full-length dresses, when all her friends are wearing pants. It's not easy for a young man not to drink booze, when all the other fellas are drinking it. Young people must be taught to do what is right when tempted. It's not easy to do what is right, when others are all doing what is wrong. This is where your good or bad character is revealed, by how you behave when others are doing wrong. If you have good character, you won't join them. If you go along to get along, it reveals your lack of character. Proverbs 1:10, “My son, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not.”

The reason why we have fundamentalist Christianity is because most people who profess to be Christians are not born again. Roman Catholics, Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh-Day Adventists and Church of Christ (to name but a few) are all pseudo-Christian cults, because they pervert God's simple plan of salvation. This is why we need ecclesiastical separation. That is, God's redeemed saints must avoid and separate from unbelievers (2nd Corinthians 6:14-17).

It is sad that most men and women today have low moral standards. Most women see nothing wrong with putting on a pair of blue jeans, halter top or a short tight skirt, but this is not pleasing to the Lord. And for that matter, a see-through white dress is just as immodest. The inspired Holy Bible commands Christian women to dress themselves in modest apparel (1st Timothy 2:9). Pants are anything but modest for a lady!!! Men wear pants. SHAME on the ungodly neo-evangelical pastors, pastor's wives, Jezebel females and bad churches today who approve of women wearing pants. If you have a problem with this, it just shows that you are not a Christian fundamentalist.

To no surprise, when I and my wife met with Pastor Brad Moffett in April of 2025 at the corrupt Family Baptist Church in Pensacola, he sinfully declared to us, “I am not a fundamentalist.” He did have to tell us that shameful fact, because we already knew it. Pastor Brad and his verbally-abusive father Bobby Moffett are evil neo-evangelicals. Their wicked church preaches another gospel, requiring lost sinners to turn away from past sinful ways (works) to get to Heaven. The pastor promotes infidels' Ken Ham, Franklin Graham, Jeff Redlin, John Calvin and John Piper—who all preach the Devil's lie of Lordship Salvation.

The reason why we have fundamentalist Bible Christianity is because most people want a spiritually dead church to attend. Jeremiah 5:31, “The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?” This is why Joel Osteen's apostate Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas, fills up with 40,000 members every Sunday.

2nd Timothy 4:2-4, “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.”

The popular “repent of your sins” damnable heresy is a fable, not biblical doctrine. Lordship Salvation is a fable, not Bible doctrine. The Greek word for “fables” is muthos which means “a tale, that is, “fiction.” The “repent of your sins” requirement to be saved is fiction. Mixing service with salvation (Lordship Salvation) is fiction. These are unbiblical teachings to be considered tommyrot, poppycock, balderdash and rubbish. Satan is a clever deceiver and a beautiful liar.

“Neo” means “new.” These neo-evangelicals in dead churches today are extremely shallow. They sing shallow Contemporary Christian Music (CCM) instead of the doctrinally rich old hymns of the Christian faith that I cherish and love to sing. Neo-evangelicals don't pay attention to the details like fundamentalists do. Whereas we dot our i's and cross our t's as fundamentalists, ungodly neo-evangelicals just don't care. They don't care about the purity of God's Word, which is why these support evil garbage like this...

The Holy Bible Has Been Corrupted To Obtain A New Copyright

All of the modern English Bible revisions are corrupt, adhering to the poisonous 1881 texts of Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort (two Anglican infidel devils - Pastor Max D. Younce exposes these reprobates). If you've seen one Westcott and Hort bible, you've seen 'em all, because they all share the SAME perversions. For example: They all remove the word “worship” from Matthew 8:2, and water it down to say a leper “knelt” or “bowed” to Jesus. Well, you can kneel before a king without worshipping him. This is a blatant attack on Jesus' deity. The inspired King James Bible accurately says that a leper worshipped Jesus. Why would the modern Bible revisions reduce this to mere respect or admiration? The answer is clear.

Several general observations can be made about NEW EVANGELICALS:

• They don't care about what matters.
• They don't pay attention to the details.
• They are all wrong on Bible repentance (i.e., the “repent of your sins” heresy).
• They all refuse to expose the Devil's lie of Lordship Salvation.
• They don't have a sense of urgency about what's important.
• They don't regularly go door to door soulwinning.
• They are lackidaical about biblical separation.
• They don't expose the Devil's modern corrupt Bible revisions.
• They don't preach against sin.
• Their women sinfully wear pants and other immodest clothing.
• They sing lame theologically deficient Contemporary Christin Music.
• They don't contend for the Christian faith.

As a Bible fundamentalist, I care and pay attention to the details. This is not just true of the things of God, but of everything in my life. The old adage is true: Cleanliness is next to godliness. Why? It is because both attributes require caring. RIGHT DOCTRINE MATTERS! It is because I DO CARE that I keep getting into ministry quarrels with carnal pastors. The Bible warns in Galatians 1:6-9 that God curses any man (even an angel) who preaches ANOTHER GOSPEL than the one the Apostle Paul taught in 1st Corinthians 15:1-6. Paul said he received that Gospel directly from Jesus (Galatians 1:12).

Any pastor who requires you to “repent of your sins” to get to Heaven is a theological LIAR!!! Jesus came into the world to die on Calvary's cross to pay our debt of sin, He does not demand that we first be willing to REFORM to receive the free gift of eternal life. The true Gospel always points you to CHRIST; a false gospel always points to YOU. Turning away from sinful ways would be a work. Faith puts all of the merit where it belongs, on the object of our faith, Jesus and His work. Salvation is not a reward for the righteous, it is a gift for the guilty. Salvation is not doing your best, it is having Christ's best put to your account through receiving Him by faith.

“The best way to kill a snake is to put him in the fire. The reason we have so many snakes in our churches is that there's no fire.” —Pastor Lester Roloff (1914-1982)

Dear reader, if you're not upset you're not paying attention! It saddens me that I need to get so worked up over false teaching in today's corrupt Bible colleges and churches, while 99% of professed Christians couldn't care less. If you're not upset you're not paying attention!!! Galatians 4:16, “Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?”

Dear reader, the $64,000 question is: Do you care? A Christian fundamentalist cares about which Bible they use. They care about the accuracy of the Gospel. They care about the purity of God's inspired Word. They care about modesty and upholding moral integrity. It is tragic that neo-evangelical churchgoers today simply don't care as much as fundamentalists do.

This sadly includes the demonic Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) which organization consists of 47,000 complicit member churches that represent roughly 12,700,000 people. The SBC are all neo-evangelicals. You won't find any fundamentalist churches within the SBC, because they are perverted regarding the gospel, moral standards and the Word of God.

The SBC's official statement of faith titled 'Baptist Faith And Message 2000' contains damnable heresy! This is so tragic folks. According to the SBC, it is not enough to put your faith in Jesus as your Savior, but in addition they say you must make a lifetime commitment to serve Him as your Lord, and turn away from your sinning. That is not the free grace plan of salvation presented in the inspired King James Bible. SHAME on the SBC and any church who bids them Godspeed! These are WORKS! The true Gospel always points you to CHRIST; a false gospel always points to YOU.

That is why they use corrupt Bible revisions like the English Standard Version (ESV), which perverts Philippians 2:6 to say that Jesus could not grasp equality with God. Neo-evangelicals just don't care. John 12:43, “For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.” Neo-evangelicals don't want to suffer reproach for the name of Christ. They refuse to be put outside the gate with Jesus, the rejected and crucified Lamb of God.

If everyone sought to please God, we wouldn't have wars in the world. If all churchgoers sought to please God by obeying the Holy Scripture, we wouldn't need Christian fundamentalism in the churches, but sadly we do! Most professed Christians today are not even born again. They are trusting in some damnable partial faith in Christ PLUS following Christ as your Lord, committing your whole person to Him and turning away from your sinful bad habits. These toxic teachings have infected and infested over 95% of all churches today, including so-called Independent Fundamental Baptist Churches.

Beware of today's corrupt churches! I am warning you about Campus Church at Pensacola Christian College! I am warning you about nearly every Baptist church CULT in the city of Pensacola and other towns across the United States! Beware of any churches whose pastor is an alumnus of the den of iniquity at Bob Jones University! Somebody's got to care! Somebody's got to get upset and say something. You know the popular adage: “If you see something, say something!” Well I've seen a lot and I've got a lot to say! Amen. John 8:26a, “I have many things to say and to judge of you...”

If I could sum up Christian Bible fundamentalism with one word, it would be 'CARING.' It's all really quite that simple, boiling down to whether you care or not friend. I CARE about right doctrine. I CARE about which Bible version we use and promote. I CARE about the accuracy of God's simple plan of salvation (1st Corinthians 15:1-6). I CARE about the purity of the inspired Holy Bible. I CARE about moral standards and how professed Christian females dress in public, because there is AN ONGOING WAR against men's souls (1st Peter 2:11). No Christian girl or woman should ever wear pants in public.

I CARE because the LORD CARES! 1st Peter 5:7, “Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you.” God cares about YOU dear reader. Oh yes, He surely does! I decided a very long time ago that I was not going to place God on trial every time things weren't going well in my life.

Galatians 6:3, “For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself.”

THANK YOU dear reader for being patient with my long rants in many of my ministry blogs. I truly do love everyone with Gods unconditional love, whoever you may be dear reader. God knows my heart, that I have always just wanted to be a blessing to others for Christ.

Jesus is precious!

Unjust In The Least

Luke 16:10, “He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much.”

“UNJUST IN THE LEAST” (from 1973 by Pastor Jack Hyles, 1926-2001)...

“If we don't watch out in little areas, then we are guilty of big sins.” —Pastor Jack Hyles, “Unjust In The Least”

This is a great truth that is so needed today. You're only as good of a Christian as your attitude toward little things. Someone might not think twice about littering, leaving your shopping cart in the parking lot for someone else to put away, women wearing pants, cheating on a test or sleeping on the job, but these seemingly little things are indications of major character flaws. There is little integrity today among churchgoers.

“Trifles make perfection, and perfection is no trifle.” —Michelangelo

I learned a very long time ago about the importance of little things. The inspired Holy Bible says in Luke 16:10, “He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much.” If God cannot trust you and me with little things, then how can He trust us with big things?

“Nothing is unimportant.” —Pastor Jack Hyles, “Unjust In The Least”

Look at someone when you shake their hand. When I went to shake hands with Pastor Bill Adams in September of 2024 at the Smyrna Baptist Church, he rudely looked off to the left 45 degrees at the wall. One week later his wife approached me in church to shake my hand and did the same rude thing, looking hard right off 45 degrees at the distant wall. When I contacted the pastor to ask him if I am welcomed in their church, twice, he completely ignored me. I got my answer. No, they don't want me there. And it's just as well, since they wickedly distribute toxic Chick Tracts, wickedly bid Godspeed to the cult at PCC, and wickedly pervert the Gospel by requiring people to be willing to turn from of their sins to be saved.

“Well you say, 'I can't make the payment.' Then don't make the debt!” —Pastor Jack Hyles, “Unjust In The Least”

There's nothing worse than a man who shakes hands like a seal. Be a man men! You should always look someone in the eye when at the cashier's counter or when shaking hands. It is proper and polite. If you look away from someone while talking or refuse to make eye contact with them while shaking hands, it automatically sends negative vibes to the other person. God only knows how many visitors never returned to a church because of unkind people.

When I attended a big event at the Harvest Baptist Church on Guam in 2014, at their new Family Living Center, I saw that the men's bathroom was atrocious! It stank with wreak. So, I took it upon myself to go find the janitor's closet and clean the entire bathroom myself. That is a servant's heart. When their incompetent ungodly pastor Marty Herron shortly thereafter kicked me out of their cult for befriending them with THE TRUTH—that Lordship Salvation is not the Gospel, John MacArthur is a modernist infidel, and the modern English Bibles are all corrupted by Satan—I reminded Pastor Herron that unlike him, I actually do care, which is why I cleaned their stinky men's room. The most important job is the one that doesn't get done!

Dear reader, kindly said, you are a fool if you think it is okay to pick and choose which Bible version that you use. RIGHT DOCTRINE MATTERS! The only inspired Words of God are in the King James Bible today! Truth matters.

I have been in numerous churches where people told me to get in line before the food runs out. I have always waited intentionally, so if indeed the food ran out I would be the one not to eat. That is a servant's heart. I am not a good Christian, but I am a servant at heart. Matthew 23:11, “But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.”

When I attended the shameful Family Baptist Church in Pensacola for 45 months, before they kicked me and my wife out in June of 2025 for TELLING THE TRUTH, I used to look forward to emptying all the garbage pails into the dumpster on big days. No one ever needed to ask or hint for me to help out, because I volunteered for the Lord.

By God's grace, I was a quite servant working behind the scenes. I brought extra storage bags, brought cases of soda on holidays, helped a blind lady friend at church regularly, I gave out Gospel booklets of John, bought food gifts for church members, brought some nuts and gifts for an elderly lady (I gave her $95 on her 95th birthday), bought glow-in-the-dark novelties for the kids on Halloween at the church's outdoor gathering, so cars could see the children glowing in the dark for safety, et cetera. Nobody asked me to do those kind things. I gladly did them on my own, with my own money, simply because I thought of ways to serve others for Jesus Christ. I care.

This is why Pastor Jack Hyles taught that LOVE IS THINKING. When you care about someone, you take the time to think of ways to express that love and concern. It is tragic that we have a bunch of stupid pastors today running the churches into the ground spiritually. They refuse to expose corrupt Bibles. They refuse to expose the Devil's fraud of Lordship Salvation, and worse, those infidels preach it! Their ungodly wives wear pants in public. There is no door-to-door soulwinning, no preaching against sin, no warnings about going to Hell, just playing the wicked neo-evangelical's game of church (merely going through the sycophantic motions).

Every redeemed child of God should clean up after yourself, and sometimes even others. As an ongoing habit, I return other customer's idle shopping carts which they abandoned in the parking lot, expecting someone else to put it back where they found it. It may seem like a small thing to do, but I believe it's a big thing to the Lord. There's one that cometh after you!

I don't claim to be a good Christian. I don't even think there is such a thing as a “good Christian.” We're all a mess today, aren't we! I can say that I do care. Little things are important. 

One word of caution about the sermon “Unjust In The Least” (1973): Dr. Hyles admitted that he preached heresy at times in the past. I disagree with his teaching in this sermon that a changed life is "proof" of salvation. The damned false prophets in Matthew 7:21-23 had done 'MANY WONDERFUL WORKS,' but still went to Hell forever. Works are not evidence of salvation, unless one is saved by works. I love Brother Hyles, but I won't go along with him when he is wrong on the Bible.

“A fella who will not take care of the details will not take care of big matters either.” —Pastor Jack Hyles, “Unjust In The Least”

I know that the Apostle James said we are justify in the sight of men by works, but there is no way of truly knowing if someone is saved apart from a direct testimony from their mouth or writing concerning Christ.

“Chasten your children for character flaws rather than mistakes.” —Pastor Jack Hyles, “Unjust In The Least”

“One of the tragic things about this generation is that we like personality more than character.” —Pastor Jack Hyles, “Unjust In The Least”

Most pastors and layman today are as crooked as a dog's hindleg. Little things are important because they lead to big things. May we all be just in the least.

Every Christian Should Be Anchored To God's Word

Psalms 1:1-2, “Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.”

I receive many emails from distraught Christians who are down on life. Part of my 23-year ministry since I started my Jesus-is-Savior.com website ministry back in 2002 is helping discouraged believers find their way. All we have is each other. If we don't encourage each other in the Lord, then who is going to do it? The unregenerate (unsaved) man certainly cannot understand the things of God, for they are foolishness to him (1st Corinthians 1:18, 2:14-16).

I learned something fascinating this week about large ship anchors. I had always thought that the anchor itself held the ship, but that's not true. When a large Navy ship drops their anchor into the muck at the bottom of the ocean, as the ship continues moving forward thousands of feet of anchor is pulled into the sea. As the ships continues to pull forward, the WEIGHT OF THE CHAIN prevents the ship from moving. So it is the chain, and not the anchor, that holds the ship in place. That is fascinating science!

In a similar way, the inspired Word of God is our anchor, but the anchor is useless without applying the truths of God's Word to out life. We must let out the chain, so to speak, by making us of the Holy Bible, wallowing in it day and night. Psalms 1:1-2, “Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.”

Jesus exhorts us to 'SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES' in John 5:39; He didn't say to search Christian talk radio, Christian magazines and books, Christian videos and television, Christian seminaries and retreats, Christian commentaries, et cetera, These things are appropriate in their place, but NOTHING should ever substitute for quality time spent reading, wallowing, memorizing and studying the inspired King James Bible. GET IN THE BOOK!!!

The Uplifting and Yet Tragic Life of Philip Bliss

Here is some intriguing history...

Philip Paul Bliss (9 July 1838 – 29 December 1876) was an American composer, conductor, writer of hymns and a bass-baritone Gospel singer. He wrote many well-known hymns, including "Hold the Fort" (1870), "Almost Persuaded" (1871); "Hallelujah, What a Saviour!" (1875); "Let the Lower Lights Be Burning"; "Wonderful Words of Life" (1875); and the tune for Horatio Spafford's "It Is Well with My Soul" (1876). Bliss was a recognized friend of D. L. Moody, the famous Chicago preacher. —Wikipedia

“Let the Lower Lights Be Burning” is a precious hymn written by Philip P. Bliss (1838-1976) in 1871, emphasizing the importance of guiding others to safety and salvation, much like how lower lights help ships navigate to harbor. The hymn encourages believers to keep their spiritual light shining to help those in need.

Let The Lower Lights Be Burning

Few people know the tragic history of Philip Bliss and his wife, who were killed in 1876 (the same year Harry Ironside was born). They were killed in a fiery train crash in Ohio when a bridge suddenly collapsed in a ravine. Bliss was only 38 years old. ...

On 29 December 1876, the Pacific Express train on which Bliss and his wife were traveling approached Ashtabula, Ohio. When the train was nearly across the bridge it collapsed and the carriages fell into the ravine below. It was stated in many newspaper accounts of the time that Bliss escaped from the wreck, but the carriages caught fire and Bliss returned to try to extricate his wife. This account was only given by J.E. Burchell. As mentioned in the P.P. Bliss Memoirs, written in 1877 by D.W. Whittle this account by J.E. Burchell was only his conjecture. In fact, Mr. Whittle showed a picture of Bliss to all surviving passengers and no one recognized Mr. Bliss but only one lady who gave no account of seeing him during the accident. No trace of either Mr. Bliss or his wife, Lucy, was discovered. Ninety-two of the 159 passengers are believed to have died in what became known as the Ashtabula River Railroad Disaster. —Wikipedia

Acts 27:41-44, “And falling into a place where two seas met, they ran the ship aground; and the forepart stuck fast, and remained unmoveable, but the hinder part was broken with the violence of the waves. And the soldiers' counsel was to kill the prisoners, lest any of them should swim out, and escape. But the centurion, willing to save Paul, kept them from their purpose; and commanded that they which could swim should cast themselves first into the sea, and get to land. And the rest, some on boards, and some on broken pieces of the ship. And so it came to pass, that they escaped all safe to land.”

Philip P. Bliss was killed suddenly at age 38, taken to meet his Maker. Oh, dear reader, make sure you've been born again while there is yet time.

Is Something Wrong With The 1769 King James Bible?

Psalms 12:6-7, “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”

Dr. David F. Reagan (1955-2007) pastored the Trinity Baptist Temple in Knoxville, Tennessee. He has written a devastating exposé on the early editions of the King James Bible entitled “The King James Version of 1611: The Myth of Early Revisions.”

Dr. Reagan has done an excellent job of destroying the last stronghold of Bible critics. I see neither a way, nor a reason to try to improve on his finding. Here is his pamphlet in its entirety.

THE KING JAMES VERSION OF 1611

THE MYTH OF EARLY REVISIONS

Introduction

Men have been “handling the word of God deceitfully” (II Cor. 4:2) ever since the devil first taught Eve how. From Cain to Balaam, from Jehudi to the scribes and Pharisees, from the Dark Age theologians to present-day scholars, the living words of the Almighty God have been prime targets for man’s corrupting hand. The attacks on the Word of God are threefold: addition, subtraction, and substitution. From Adam’s day to the computer age, the strategies have remained the same. There is nothing new under the sun.

One attack which is receiving quite a bit of attention these days is a direct attack on the Word of God as preserved in the English language: the King James Version of 1611. The attack referred to is the myth which claims that since the King James Version has already been revised four times, there should be and can be no valid objection to other revisions. This myth was used by the English Revisers of 1881 and has been revived in recent years by Fundamentalist scholars hoping to sell their latest translation. This book is given as an answer to this attack. The purpose of the material is not to convince those who would deny this preservation but to strengthen the faith of those who already believe in a preserved English Bible.

One major question often arises in any attack such as this. How far should we go in answering the critics? If we were to attempt to answer every shallow objection to the infallibility of the English Bible, we would never be able to accomplish anything else. Sanity must prevail somewhere. As always, the answer is in God’s Word. Proverbs 26:4-5 states: Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.

Obviously, there are times when a foolish query should be ignored and times when it should be met with an answer. If to answer the attack will make you look as foolish as the attacker, then the best answer is to ignore the question. For instance, if you are told that the Bible cannot be infallible because so-and-so believes that it is, and he is divorced, then you may safely assume that silence is the best answer. On the other hand, there are often questions and problems that, if true, would be serious. To ignore these issues would be to leave the Bible attacker wise in his own conceit. I believe that the question of revisions to the King James Version of 1611 is a question of the second class. If the King James Version has undergone four major revisions of its text, then to oppose further revisions on the basis of an established English text would truly be faulty. For this reason, this attack should and must be answered. Can the argument be answered? Certainly! That is the purpose of this book.

I – THE PRINTING CONDITIONS OF 1611

If God did preserve His Word in the English language through the Authorized Version of 1611 (and He did), then where is our authority for the infallible wording? Is it in the notes of the translators? Or is it to be found in the proof copy sent to the printers? If so, then our authority is lost because these papers are lost. But, you say, the authority is in the first copy which came off the printing press. Alas, that copy has also certainly perished. In fact, if the printing of the English Bible followed the pattern of most printing jobs, the first copy was probably discarded because of bad quality. That leaves us with existing copies of the first printing. They are the ones often pointed out as the standard by which all other King James Bibles are to be compared. But are they? Can those early printers of the first edition not be allowed to make printing errors? We need to establish one thing from the outset. The authority for our preserved English text is not found in any human work. The authority for our preserved and infallible English text is in God! Printers may foul up at times and humans will still make plenty of errors, but God in His power and mercy will preserve His text despite the weaknesses of fallible man. Now, let us look at the pressures on a printer in the year of 1611.

Although the printing press had been invented in 1450 by Johann Gutenburg in Germany (161 years before the 1611 printing), the equipment used by the printer had changed very little. Printing was still very slow and difficult. All type was set by hand, one piece at a time (that’s one piece at a time through the whole Bible), and errors were an expected part of any completed book. Because of this difficulty and also because the 1611 printers had no earlier editions from which to profit, the very first edition of the King James Version had a number of printing errors. As shall later be demonstrated, these were not the sort of textual alterations which are freely made in modern bibles. They were simple, obvious printing errors of the sort that can still be found at times in recent editions even with all of the advantages of modem printing. These errors do not render a Bible useless, but they should be corrected in later editions.

The two original printings of the Authorized Version demonstrate the difficulty of printing in 1611 without making mistakes. Both editions were printed in Oxford. Both were printed in the same year: 1611. The same printers did both jobs. Most likely, both editions were printed on the same printing press. Yet, in a strict comparison of the two editions, approximately 100 textual differences can be found. In the same vein the King James critics can find only about 400 alleged textual alterations in the King James Version after 375 years of printing and four so-called revisions! Something is rotten in Scholarsville! The time has come to examine these revisions.”

11 – THE FOUR SO-CALLED REVISIONS OF THE 1611 KJV

Much of the information in this section is taken from a book by F.H.A. Scrivener called The Authorized Edition of the English Bible (1611), Its Subsequent Reprints and Modern Representatives. The book is as pedantic as its title indicates. The interesting point is that Scrivener, who published this book in 1884, was a member of the Revision Committee of 1881. He was not a King James Bible believer, and therefore his material is not biased toward the Authorized Version.

In the section of Scrivener’s book dealing with the KJV “revisions,” one initial detail is striking. The first two so-called major revisions of the King James Bible occurred within 27 years of the original printing. (The language must have been changing very rapidly in those days.) The 1629 edition of the Bible printed in Cambridge is said to have been the first revision. A revision it was not, but simply a careful correction of earlier printing errors. Not only was this edition completed just eighteen years after the translation, but two of the men who participated in this printing, Dr. Samuel Ward and John Bois, had worked on the original translation of the King James Version. Who better to correct early errors than two who had worked on the original translation! Only nine years later and in Cambridge again, another edition came out which is supposed to have been the second major revision. Both Ward and Bois were still alive, but it is not known if they participated at this time. But even Scrivener, who as you remember worked on the English Revised Version of 1881, admitted that the Cambridge printers had simply reinstated words and clauses overlooked by the 1611 printers and amended manifest errors. According to a study which will be detailed later, 72% of the approximately 400 textual corrections in the KJV were completed by the time of the 1638 Cambridge edition, only 27 years after the original printing!

Just as the first two so-called revisions were actually two stages of one process: the purification of early printing errors, so the last two so-called revisions were two stages in another process: the standardization of the spelling, These two editions were only seven years apart (1762 and 1769) with the second one completing what the first had started. But when the scholars are numbering revisions, two sounds better than one. Very few textual corrections were necessary at this time. The thousands of alleged changes are spelling changes made to match the established correct forms. These spelling changes will be discussed later. Suffice it to say at this time that the tale of four major revisions is truly a fraud and a myth. But you say, there are still changes whether they be few or many. What are you going to do with the changes that are still there? Let us now examine the character of these changes.

III – THE SO-CALLED THOUSANDS OF CHANGES

Suppose someone were to take you to a museum to see an original copy of the King James Version. You come to the glass case where the Bible is displayed and look down at the opened Bible through the glass. Although you are not allowed to flip through its pages, you can readily tell that there are some very different things about this Bible from the one you own. You can hardly read its words, and those you can make out are spelled in odd and strange ways. Like others before you, you leave with the impression that the King James Version has undergone a multitude of changes since its original printing in 1611. But beware, you have just been taken by a very clever ploy. The differences you saw are not what they seem to be. Let’s examine the evidence.

Printing Changes

For proper examination, the changes can be divided into three kinds: printing changes, spelling changes, and textual changes. Printing changes will be considered first. The type style used in 1611 by the KJV translators was the Gothic Type Style. The type style you are reading right now and are familiar with is Roman Type. Gothic Type is sometimes called Germanic because it originated in Germany. Remember, that is where printing was invented. The Gothic letters were formed to resemble the hand-drawn manuscript lettering of the Middle Ages. At first, it was the only style in use. The Roman Type Style was invented fairly early, but many years passed before it became the predominate style in most European countries. Gothic continued to be used in Germany until recent years. In 1611 in England, Roman Type was already very popular and would soon supersede the Gothic. However, the original printers chose the Gothic Style for the KJV because it was considered to be more beautiful and eloquent than the Roman. But the change to Roman Type was not long in coming. In 1612, the first King James Version using Roman Type was printed. Within a few years, all the bibles printed used the Roman Type Style.

Please realize that a change in type style no more alters the text of the Bible than a change in format or type size does. However, the modem reader who has not become familiar with Gothic can find it very difficult to understand. Besides some general change in form, several specific letter changes need to be observed. For instance, the Gothic s looks like the Roman s when used as a capital letter or at the end of a word. But when it is used as a lower case s at the beginning or in the middle of a word, the letter looks like our f. Therefore, also becomes alfo and set becomes fet. Another variation is found in the German v and u. The Gothic v looks like a Roman u while the Gothic u looks like the Roman v. This explains why our w is called a double-u and not a double-v. Sound confusing? It is until you get used to it. In the 1611 edition, love is loue, us is vs, and ever is euer. But remember, these are not even spelling changes. They are simply type style changes. In another instance, the Gothic j looks like our i. So Jesus becomes Iefus (notice the middle s changed to f) and joy becomes ioy. Even the Gothic d with the stem leaning back over the circle in a shape resembling that of the Greek Delta. These changes account for a large percentage of the “thousands” of changes in the KJV, yet they do no harm whatsoever to the text. They are nothing more than a smokescreen set up by the attackers of our English Bible.

Spelling Changes

Another kind of change found in the history of the Authorized Version are changes of orthography or spelling. Most histories date the beginning of Modern English around the year 1500. Therefore, by 1611 the grammatical structure and basic vocabulary of present-day English had long been established. However, the spelling did not stabilize at the same time. In the 1600’s spelling was according to whim. There was no such thing as correct spelling. No standards had been established. An author often spelled the same word several different ways, often in the same book and sometimes on the same page. And these were the educated people. Some of you reading this today would have found the 1600’s a spelling paradise. Not until the eighteenth century did the spelling begin to take a stable form. Therefore, in the last half of the eighteenth century, the spelling of the King James Version of 1611 was standardized.

What kind of spelling variations can you expect to find between your present edition and the 1611 printing? Although every spelling difference cannot be categorized, several characteristics are very common. Additional e’s were often found at the end of the words such as feare, darke, and beare. Also, double vowels were much more common than they are today. You would find ee, bee, and mooued instead of me, be, and moved. Double consonants were also much more common. What would ranne, euill, and ftarres be according to present-day spelling? See if you can figure them out. The present-day spellings would be ran, evil, and stars. These typographical and spelling changes account for almost all of the so-called thousands of changes in the King James Bible. None of them alter the text in any way. Therefore they cannot be honestly compared with thousands of true textual changes which are blatantly made in the modern versions.

Textual Changes

Almost all of the alleged changes have been accounted for. We now come to the question of actual textual differences between our present editions and that of 1611. There are some differences between the two, but they are not the changes of a revision. They are instead the correction of early printing errors. That this is a fact may be seen in three things: (1) the character of the changes, (2) the frequency of the changes throughout the Bible, and (3) the time the changes were made. First, let us look at the character of the changes made from the time of the first printing of the Authorized English Bible.

The changes from the 1611 edition that are admittedly textual are obviously printing errors because of the nature of these changes. They are not textual changes made to alter the reading. In the first printing, words were sometimes inverted. Sometimes a plural was written as singular or visa versa. At times a word was miswritten for one that was similar. A few times a word or even a phrase was omitted. The omissions were obvious and did not have the doctrinal implications of those found in modern translations. In fact, there is really no comparison between the corrections made in the King James text and those proposed by the scholars of today.

F.H.A. Scrivener, in the appendix of his book, lists the variations between the 1611 edition of the KJV and later printings. A sampling of these corrections is given below. In order to be objective, the samples give the first textual correction on consecutive left hand pages of Scrivener’s book. The 1611 reading is given first; then the present reading; and finally, the date the correction was first made:

• this thing – this thing also (1638)
• shalt have remained – ye shall have remained (1762)
• Achzib, nor Helbath, nor Aphik – of Achzib, nor of Helbath, nor of Aphik (1762)
• requite good – requite me good (1629)
• this book of the Covenant – the book of this covenant (1629)
• chief rulers – chief ruler (1629)
• And Parbar – At Parbar (1638)
• For this cause – And for this cause (1638)
• For the king had appointed – for so the king had appointed (1629)
• Seek good – seek God (1617)
• The cormorant – But the cormorant (1629)
• returned – turned (1769)
• a fiery furnace – a burning fiery furnace (1638)
• The crowned – Thy crowned (1629)
• thy right doeth – thy right hand doeth (1613)
• the wayes side – the way side (1743)
• which was a Jew – which was a Jewess (1629)
• the city – the city of the Damascenes (1629)
• now and ever – both now and ever (1638)
• which was of our father’s – which was our fathers (1616)

Before your eyes are 5% of the textual changes made in the King James Version in 375 years. Even if they were not corrections of previous errors, they would be of no comparison to modem alterations. But they are corrections of printing errors, and therefore no comparison is at all possible. Look at the list for yourself and you will find only one that has serious doctrinal implications. In fact, in an examination of Scrivener’s entire appendix, it is the only variation found by this author that could be accused of being doctrinal. I am referring to Psalm 69:32 where the 1611 edition has “seek good” when the Bible should have read “seek God.” Yet, even with this error, two points demonstrate that this was indeed a printing error. First, the similarity of the words “good” and “God” in spelling shows how easily a weary type setter could misread the proof and put the wrong word in the text. Second, this error was so obvious that it was caught and corrected in the year 1617, only six years after the original printing and well before the first so-called revision. The myth that there are several major revisions to the 1611 KJV should be getting clearer. But there is more.

Not only does the character of the changes show them to be printing errors, so does their frequency. Fundamentalist scholars refer to the thousands of revisions made to the 1611 as if they were on a par with the recent bible versions. They are not. The overwhelming majority of them are either type style or spelling changes. The few which do remain are clearly corrections of printing errors made because of the tediousness involved in the early printing process. The sample list given above will demonstrate just how careful Scrivener was in listing all the variations. Yet, even with this great care, only approximately 400 variations are named between the 1611 edition and modern copies. Remember that there were 100 variations between the first two Oxford editions which were both printed in 1611. Since there are almost 1200 chapters in the Bible, the average variation per chapter (after 375 years) is one third, i.e., one correction per every three chapters. These are changes such as “chief rulers” to “chief ruler” and “And Parbar” to “At Parbar.” But there is yet one more evidence that these variations are simply corrected printing errors: the early date at which they were corrected.

The character and frequency of the textual changes clearly

separate them from modern alterations. But the time the changes were made settles the issue absolutely. The great majority of the 400 corrections were made within a few years of the original printing. Take, for example, our earlier sampling. Of the twenty corrections listed, one was made in 1613, one in 1616, one in 1617, eight in 1629, five in 1638, one in 1743, two in 1762, and one in 1769. That means that 16 out of 20 corrections, or 80%, were made within twenty-seven years of the 1611 printing. That is hardly the long drawn out series of revisions the scholars would have you to believe. In another study made by examining every other page of Scrivener’s appendix in detail, 72% of the textual corrections were made by 1638. There is no “revision” issue.

The character of the textual changes is that of obvious errors. The frequency of the textual changes is sparse, occurring only once per three chapters. The chronology of the textual changes is early with about three fourths of them occurring within twenty-seven years of the first printing. All of these details establish the fact that there were no true revisions in the sense of updating the language or correcting translation errors. There were only editions which corrected early typographical errors. Our source of authority for the exact wording of the 1611 Authorized Version is not in the existing copies of the first printing. Our source of authority for the exact wording of our English Bible is in the preserving power of Almighty God. Just as God did not leave us the original autographs to fight and squabble over, so He did not see fit to leave us the proof copy of the translation. Our authority is in the hand of God as always. You can praise the Lord for that!

IV – CHANGES IN THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES

An in-depth study of the changes made in the book of Ecclesiastes would help to illustrate the principles stated above. The author is grateful to Dr. David Reese of Millbrook, Alabama, for his work in this area. By comparing a 1611 reprint of the original edition put out by Thomas Nelson & Sons with recent printing of the King James Version, Dr. Reese was able to locate four variations in the book of Ecclesiastes. The reference is given first; then the text of the Thomas Nelson 1611 reprint. This is followed by the reading of the present editions of the 1611 KJV and the date the change was made.

• 1:5 the place – his place (1638)
• 2:16 shall be – shall all be (1629)
• 8:17 out, yea further – out, yet he shall not find it; yea farther (1629)
• 11: 17 thing is it – thing it is (?)

Several things should be noted about these changes. The last variation (“thing is it” to “thing it is”) is not mentioned by Scrivener who was a very careful and accurate scholar. Therefore, this change may be a misprint in the Thomas Nelson reprint. That would be interesting. The corrected omission in chapter eight is one of the longest corrections of the original printing. But notice that it was corrected in 1629. The frequency of printing errors is average (four errors in twelve chapters). But the most outstanding fact is that the entire book of Ecclesiastes reads exactly like our present editions without even printing errors by the year 1638. That’s approximately 350 years ago. By that time, the Bible was being printed in Roman type. Therefore, all (and I mean all) that has changed in 350 years in the book of Ecclesiastes is that the spelling has been standardized! As stated before, the main purpose of the 1629 and 1638 Cambridge editions was the correction of earlier printing errors. And the main purpose of the 1762 and 1769 editions was the standardization of spelling.

V – THE SO-CALLED JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER REVISIONS

Maybe now you see that the King James Version of 1611 has not been revised but only corrected. But why does it make that much difference? Although there are several reasons why this issue is important, the most pressing one is that fundamentalist scholars are using this myth of past revisions to justify their own tampering with the text. The editors of the New King James Version have probably been the worst in recent years to use this propaganda ploy. In the preface of the New King James they have stated, “For nearly four hundred years, and throughout several revisions of its English form, the King James Bible has been deeply revered among the English-speaking peoples of the world. “In the midst of their flowery rhetoric, they strongly imply that their edition is only a continuation of the revisions that have been going on for the past 375 years. This implication, which has been stated directly by others, could not be more false. To prove this point, we will go back to the book of Ecclesiastes.

An examination of the first chapter in Ecclesiastes in the New King James Version reveals approximately 50 changes from our present edition. In order to be fair, spelling changes (cometh to comes; labour to labor; etc.) were not included in this count. That means there are probably about 600 alterations in the book of Ecclesiastes and approximately 60,000 changes in the entire Bible. If you accuse me of including every recognizable change, you are correct. But I am only counting the sort of changes which were identified in analyzing the 1611 King James. That’s only fair. Still, the number of changes is especially baffling for a version which claims to be an updating in the same vein as earlier revisions. According to the fundamentalist scholar, the New King James is only a fifth in a series of revisions. Then pray tell me how four “revisions” and 375 years brought only 400 changes while the fifth revision brought about 60,000 additional changes? That means that the fifth revision made 150 times more changes than the total number of changes in the first four! That’s preposterous!

Not only is the frequency of the changes unbelievable, but the character of the alterations are serious. Although many of the alterations seem harmless enough at first glance, many are much more serious. The editors of the New King James Version were sly enough not to alter the most serious blunders of the modern bibles. Yet, they were not afraid to change the reading in those places that are unfamiliar to the average fundamentalist. In these areas, the New King James Version is dangerous. Below are some of the more harmful alterations made in the book of Ecclesiastes. The reference is given first; then the reading as found in the King James Version; and last, the reading as found in the New King James Version:

• 1:13 sore travail; grievous task
• 1:14 vexation of spirit; grasping for the wind
• 1:16 my heart had great experience of wisdom; My heart has understood great wisdom
• 2:3 to give myself unto; to gratify my flesh with
• 2:3 acquainting; guiding
• 2:21 equity; skill
• 3:10 the travail, which God hath given; the God-given task
• 3:11 the world; eternity
• 3:18 that God might manifest them; God tests them
• 3:18 they themselves are beasts; they themselves are like beasts
• 3:22 portion; heritage
• 4:4 right work; skillful work
• 5:1 Keep thy foot; Walk prudently
• 5:6 the angel; the messenger of God
• 5:6 thy voice; your excuse
• 5:8 he that is higher than the highest; high official
• 5:20 God answereth him; God keeps him busy
• 6:3 untimely birth; stillborn child
• 7:29 inventions; schemes
• 8:1 boldness; sterness
• 8:10 the place of the holy; the place of holiness
• 10:1 Dead flies cause the ointment of the apothecary to send forth a stinking savour; Dead flies putrefy the perfumer’s ointment
• 10:10 If the iron be blunt; If the ax is dull
• 10:10 wisdom is profitable to direct; wisdom brings success
• 12:9 gave good heed; pondered
• 12:11 the masters of assemblies; scholars

This is only a sampling of the changes in the book, but notice what is done. Equity, which is a trait of godliness, becomes skill (2:21). The world becomes eternity (3:11). Man without God is no longer a beast but just like a beast (3:18). The clear reference to deity in Ecclesiastes 5:8 (“he that is higher than the highest”) is successfully removed (“higher official”). But since success is what wisdom is supposed to bring us (10: 10), this must be progress. At least God is keeping the scholars busy (5:20). Probably the most revealing of the above mentioned changes is the last one listed where “the masters of assemblies” become “scholars.” According to the New King James, “the words of scholars are like well-driven nails, given by one Shepherd.” The masters of assemblies are replaced by the scholars who become the source of the Shepherd’s words. That is what these scholars would like us to think, but it is not true.

In conclusion, the New King James is not a revision in the vein of former revisions of the King James Version. It is instead an entirely new translation. As stated in the introduction, the purpose of this book is not to convince those who use the other versions. The purpose of this book is to expose a fallacious argument that has been circulating in fundamentalist circles for what it is: an overblown myth. That is, the myth that the New King James Version and others like it are nothing more than a continuation of revisions which have periodically been made to the King James Version since 1611. There is one problem with this theory. There are no such revisions.

What is the Difference in the KJV 1611 and 1769?

The King James Bible of 1611 has not undergone four (or any) major revisions. Therefore, the New King James Version is not a continuation of what has gone on before. It should in fact be called the Thomas Nelson Version. They hold the copyright. The King James Version we have today has not been revised but purified. We still have no reason to doubt that the Bible we hold in our hands is the very word of God preserved for us in the English language.

The authority for its veracity lies not in the first printing of the King James Version in 1611, or in the character of King James 1, or in the scholarship of the 1611 translators, or in the literary accomplishments of Elizabethan England, or even in the Greek Received Text. Our authority for the infallible words of the English Bible lies in the power and promise of God to preserve His Word! God has the power. We have His Word.

American Hero: Cindy Sheehan!

Ecclesiastes 5:8, “If thou seest the oppression of the poor, and violent perverting of judgment and justice in a province, marvel not at the matter: for he that is higher than the highest regardeth; and there be higher than they.”

Cindy Sheehan is an American hero! Cindy Sheehan's son Casey Sheehan (May 29, 1979 - April 4, 2004) was murdered by President George W. Bush 21-years ago in Iraq while serving in the U.S. Army. Miss Sheehan became a prominent anti-war activist following her son's death, criticizing the lying fabricated reasons for the Iraq War and demanding accountability from President George W. Bush. Sadly, it still hasn't happened, and never will in this lifetime.

I fully understand that Miss Sheehan is a left-wing liberal who supports abortion (with which moral stance I totally disagree), but this lady is a pissed off grieving mother of a murdered son by the U.S. government, who seeks justice for her lost boy and has a message for Americans today (I copied this truthful meme from Cindy's blog). ...

Amen and amen, that's what I've been saying to Christians for decades. Either we stand together, or we'll hang separately! I stand with Cindy against blatant corruption within our U.S. federal government, Pentagon and White House. There must be justice! Whether 3 years old or 90 years old, everybody deserves JUSTICE! Vengeance is the Lord's (Romans 12:19-21).

Tragically, our teenage children who enroll into the U.S. military, trusting our government, are often sacrificed on foreign soil for agendas that have absolutely nothing to do with preserving our liberties and freedoms. If you don't believe me, ask American hero Cindy Sheehan, whose soldier son came back from Iraq in a body bag only 5-days after he arrived. So tragic and sad. God bless Casey and his family.

Contemptible coward, President George W. Bush, refused to even meet with the deeply grieving mother, to simply answer her legitimate question why her son was even in Iraq. We already know the tragic answer, which is because The White House LIED about alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction existing in Iraq. U.S. troops should never have been sent to Iraq in the first place. Congress never sanctioned the Iraqi War. The entire illegal Iraqi War was a ruse and a farce, all based on a big fabricated lie. President Bush refused to meet with Casey's mother because Mr. Bush is guilty, guilty, guilty!

My heart sincerely goes out to this grieving mother and I stand with her against the demonic criminal cartel of despicable leaders (i.e., George H. Bush, George W. Bush, Marvin Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, to name but a few guilty perpetrators behind the atrocities of 9/11 and the Iraq War). Those demonic villains murdered 2,300,000 innocent people in Iraq to steal their trillions of dollars of oil.

I thank God for Cindy Sheehan! Just like her son Casey, she is courageous to fight for the cause. Cindy is fighting against the evildoers. Psalms 94:16, “Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?”

The Sanctity Of Life

Deuteronomy 32:39, “See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand.”

No one other than God our Creator has the right to take a human life. The ungodly country of Canada has crossed a deeply unsettling threshold—over 5% of all deaths in 2024 were attributed to euthanasia, and many of those individuals were not terminally ill.

Canada Sets New Record, Killing 16,499 People by Euthanasia – Disabled Citizens Feel 'Threatened'
TALIA WISE - December 5, 2025 

As Canada approaches its 10-year mark of practicing legalized assisted suicide, a new government report finds that the country has hit a new record of euthanasia deaths. 

Health Canada's Sixth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) report reveals that a total of 16,499 people were put to death by euthanasia in 2024 – that is 1 in 20 deaths, according to some estimates. 

Although the largest increase in MAID participation was from 2019 to 2020 by 36.8%, there was yet another 6.9% increase from 2023 to 2024. The report claims that the number of "annual MAID provisions is beginning to stabilize. However, it will take several more years before long-term trends can be conclusively identified."

Striking an upbeat tone about the killings, Canada's Minister of Health, Marjorie Michel, said, "I am pleased to share Health Canada's Sixth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying." She claimed that the program ensures that "the federal legal framework protects those who are vulnerable, while supporting freedom of choice and personal autonomy." 

While the report attempts to spin euthanasia as positive, some of its data reveal the grim nature of the federal program. 

Nearly one-fifth of the 23,000 people who requested MAID, had a "grievous and irremediable medical condition," such as diabetes, autoimmune conditions, and chronic pain, and were denied assisted suicide. 

But about 4% of people who were approved for assisted suicide did not have a terminal diagnosis or reasonably foreseeable death. 

Nearly 23% of people overall reported "isolation or loneliness" as a reason for seeking euthanasia. Medical practitioners reported that about 50% of people requested it because of being a "perceived burden on family, friends, or caregivers."

READ MORE: https://cbn.com/news/health/canada-sets-new-record-killing-16499-people-euthanasia-disabled-citizens-feel

In 2024 alone, 16,499 Canadians chose assisted death. The most disturbing trend: growing numbers are being driven not by medical necessity, but by poverty, chronic pain, and crushing loneliness. Internal documents even reveal cases where people sought euthanasia because they simply couldn’t afford to keep living. Cancer remains the leading factor, yet with wait times now stretching ridiculously to 27.7 weeks, even treatable patients are losing all hope. What began as a compassionate option for the suffering, has begun to look like a substitute for proper care, and it’s igniting one of the most urgent ethical debates in history. Exodus 20:13, “Thou shalt not kill.”

In Florida in 2005, I will never forget the horrifying torture and murder of an innocent 41-year-old woman, Terri Schiavo (December 3rd, 1963 - March 31st, 2005). God bless Terri's Mom and Dad for fighting to save her life, even though evil prevailed. Florida's former corrupt piece of trash governor at the time, Jeb Ellis Bush (JEB), refused to intercede to spare Terri's life. Neither did his scum of the earth war criminal, mass-murdering, arrogant, smug and illiterate, younger brother President George W. Bush intercede to save Terri's life. They said let her perish! I guarantee you that President Donald Trump would have saved Terri's precious life.

All life is sacred to God. We kill rodents and insects that pester us, and that is okay. God has given mankind dominion over the earth (Genesis 1:26-28). But I humbly believe we ought never kill just because we can. I once blew up a bluegill fish by lighting a firecracker in his mouth when I was a teenager. Needless to say it ended his life. I still feel guilty. I was a stupid kid that day. Now that I am older, bolder and much more wise, I would never harm any living creature just because I can or for sport.

I've never been a hunter. My father wasn't a hunter, we went fishing instead. I have never owned a gun that uses powdered shells. I don't trust myself with a gun. I'm not against guns and I strongly support the Second Amendment which outlines our God-given right to arm bears. Wait, reverse that, bear arms! But for me personally, it is just too easy to pull a trigger, and like our words, the bullets simply cannot be recalled once fired.

I am scared of myself as a flawed sinful human being. I would ten million times rather that someone harms me, than to spent the rest of my life rotting in prison because in a moment of passion I killed someone with a gun. I realize that just about any tangible item can be used as a weapon, but guns were invented for the sole purpose of taking someone's life. I am not a pacifist. War is a necessary reality of life on earth. I would proudly answer the call to go to war if it ever happened, to defend our liberty and freedom in the United States.

Tragically, our children who enroll into the U.S. military, trusting our government, are often sacrificed on foreign soil for agendas that have absolutely nothing to do with preserving our liberties and freedoms. If you don't believe me, ask American hero Cindy Sheehan, whose soldier son came back from Iraq in a body bag only 5-days after he arrived there. So sad.

President George W. Bush refused to meet with a grieving mother, to just answer her legitimate question why her son was even in Iraq. We already know the tragic answer, which is that The White House LIED about alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction existing in Iraq. U.S. troops should never have been sent to Iraq in the first place. Congress never sanctioned the Iraqi War. The entire illegal Iraqi War was a ruse and a farce, all based on a big fabricated lie. 

The sad and horrific truth is that the American public CANNOT believe 99% of anything concerning 9/11 by the controlled mainstream newsmedia. They are all LYING PRESSTITUES!!! I believe 31-year retired NYFD veteran Rudy Dent, who has openly confirmed that 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB!!! (audio backup in case the video is removed). I do hope you realize that the entire mainstream media is controlled by the Luciferian Globalist elite (the secret occult-driven hidden powers behind all existing governments). Remember, the inspired Word of God identifies Satan as the god of this world (2nd Corinthians 4:4).

Sadly, there were 2,997 Americans brutally MURDERED on 9/11 in 2001. 343 firefighters were MURDERED that terrible day. 200 innocent people jumped to their tragic deaths from over 80 stories high, to escape the scorching fiery inferno heated to thousands of degrees Fahrenheit. Jesus Christ died on a cross 2,000 years ago for each and every one of those VICTIMS. In fact, Christ died for the perpetrators also who pulled off 911 (2nd Peter 2:1). The White House got caught red-handed on 911, but sadly they are ABOVE THE LAW!

Thankfully they are NOT ABOVE GOD'S LAW (Ecclesiastes 5:8, 12:13-14). Hell will be hot enough I assure you, which Dick Cheney found out on November 3rd, 2025, when he died a couple months ago. The American people have been lied to every step of the way concerning what really happened on 9/11 by the corrupt media, hired biased specialists and wicked government. THE TRUTH cannot be eradicated. Thankfully, there is a caring God in Heaven.

Satan's Crowd Knows What's Wrong With Pants On Women

If you don't want to listen to the inspired Holy Bible, then maybe you'll listen to a secular singer as proof from the unsaved world why pants on women is a sin. The following lyrics are from the worldly Hip Hip artist, Chingy, from his 2006 album Hoodstar; the song title is “Dem Jeans.”

Any clothing that sensually arouses a man is sexy attire. Men are aroused by sight, but women by touch.

This is why the inspired Holy Bible teaches in 1st Corinthians 7:1b, “It is good for a man not to touch a woman.”

No man should ever hug a woman to whom he is not married. That is my personal opinion based on this passage of Scripture.

Here are the disgusting (but very honest) lyrics to Chingy's song, 'DEM JEANS'...

How the hell did you get all of that in dem jeans

How da how da hell did you get all of that in dem jeans

'cause your waist so little and your a$$ it like wo

'cause your waist so little and your a$$ it like wo

[Chingy]

Back it up a bit

Yeah that's it

'cause I can see your thong

Caramel skin tone...

Let me help you with dem jeans

Baby lay down

[Chorus]

Damn Girl

How'd you get all that in

Dem Jeans

Dem Jeans

How'd you get all that in Dem

Damn Girl

How'd you get all that

(Is you talkin to me?) 

Yeah you

I bet you had to jump up and down

Just to put 'em on

Bet you had to wiggle it around

Just to put 'em on

Bet you had to lay back on the bed

Just to zip 'em up

Am I right?

(You right)

Baby that's what's up

[JD]

Now Now Now

When walkin' girl

And you make it swirl

Its hard for me not to look... 

Hope you ain't up in here with your man ma

I love it when you wiggle it Shake it

Drop it and do your little dance ma

True Religion, 7's... 

When you walk away it make me wanna rub it... 

[Chorus]

Damn Girl

How'd you get all that in

Dem Jeans

Dem Jeans

How'd you get all that in Dem...

I bet you had to jump up and down

Just to put 'em on

Bet you had to wiggle it around

Just to put 'em on

Bet you had to lay back on the bed

Just to zip 'em up

Am I right?

(You right)

Baby that's whets up

[Chingy]

I don't mean to be rude but I like

The way you move

Got your boy in the mood...

let it show it,

like them curves

make that thing talk when you walk

I'm slurring ma words...

man you working wit a lot.

Now that is a wicked worldly singer telling the truth, while thousands of ungodly pastors and their evil wives today are in total spiritual denial, angrily insisting that there is nothing biblically wrong or sinful about a woman wearing pants in public. YOU KNOW IT IS VERY WRONG!!!

American Women In 1900 Wore Dresses

Only a rebellious woman who deliberately disobeys the inspired Word of God wear pants. It is clear from these unsaved singers (like Chingy) why women ought not wear pants. Pants on women is adulterous in nature, which causes normal men to lust and sin. Any pastor who says otherwise is a pathetic LIAR!

Jesus made it clear that lust is adultery in Matthew 5:28, "But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Women who wear pants deliberately cause men to lust and commit the sin of adultery. It is this spirit of fornication which has caused over 65,000,000 unwanted pregnancies and abortions in the United States since 1973.

The average person today scoffs at the idea that Rock-n-Roll, Satanism and immoral sex go hand-in-hand, but they certainly do. When the British Invasion came to America with their low morals, so did pants on women become mainstream. The ungodly mini-skirt made its evil debut in 1964 in the United States. The hippie “free love” culture of fornication followed in the late 1960s, and then the demonic abortion industry since the 1970s.

Sexual immorality is a driving theme in most rock music. Listen to telling quotes from the singers themselves...

"Sex is where it's at in music... and I like it." (Johnny Bristol)

"I’ve always thought that the main ingredients in rock are sex, really good stage shows and really sassy music, Sex and sass, I think that’s where it’s at." (Debbie Harry, aka, 'Blondie')

"I'm in rock music for the sex and narcotics." (Glenn Frey of 'The Eagles')

"Rock 'n' roll is 99% sex." (John Oates)

"Everyone takes it for granted that rock and roll is synonymous with sex."(Chris Stein, lead guitarist with 'Blondie')

"Rock music is sex. The beat matches the body rhythms." (Frank Zappa, superstar of 'Mothers of Invention' fame)

What more evidence do you need? You are accountable to God ladies for the way you dress, the men you cause to lust and the sins/crimes they commit as a result.

In April of 2025 at the ungodly Family Baptist Church in Pensacola, I heard Pastor Brad Moffett arrogantly say that his wife wears pants in public and she loves Jesus as much as anybody. NO, SHE DOES NOT!!! Pastor Brad is deceived by Satan! My wife has never wore a pair of pants in her entire life, because she truly fears God and has chosen to follow the old paths of virtue, modesty and decency. There's nothing more worldly, upsetting and shameful than for a professed Christian female to place her body on display by wearing pants. Men can clearly see a woman's thighs and buttocks who wears blue jeans or anything similar. I wish I could convince Christian women to stop wearing pants in public, because men are watching.

It is no coincidence that Hollywood has been putting nudity in their films as much as possible since the 1930's. Even in the 1966 film titled, “THE BIBLE: IN THE BEGINNING,” a 19-year-old Swedish woman (played by Ulla Bergryd) appears totally butt naked, showing everything. She plays Eve in the film. The film was accepted by the churches simply because it was produced as a religious film. These are so-called “Christian films” produced by the cesspool of iniquity of Hollywood—ungodly, Christ-rejecting, pedophiles own and control Hollywood and God's judgment is upon them all. It is this evil group of perverts who have shaped America's moral standards since the 1920's, and look at the mess were in today!

If you're not angry, you're watching too much television!